High Court case over autistic twins sparks nationwide debate on disability inclusion in education – In a landmark move, the Bombay High Court was approached by a mother on behalf of her seven‑year‑old autistic twins, challenging a private school in Andheri West for refusing to admit them under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act. The case brings into sharp focus the gaps in India’s disability accommodation laws and raises urgent questions about how schools accommodate children with special needs.
Background / Context
In July 2024, the mother, Rita Joshi, applied for admission for her twins under the 5% disability quota allotted by the RTE Act. After fulfilling all procedural requirements, the school’s admission office denied entry in August, citing a lack of “adequate facilities” for children with special needs and insisting that the parents arrange and finance shadow teachers. The denial came while the twins had already been allotted a seat for the 2024 intake.
Under Section 16 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, schools are mandated to provide “reasonable accommodation” and “individualised support” at the institution’s expense, not at the family’s. Yet the twin’s refusal is being challenged on the ground that the school itself is failing to comply with both the RTE Act and the RPwD Act, violating the Constitution’s guarantees of equality (Article 14), life and liberty (Article 21) and the right to education (Article 21A).
This case follows a 2021 Supreme Court ruling that “a state and a private institution cannot deny admission to children with disabilities on the pretext of lack of facilities.” It is the first time a parents’ petition has directly confronted a private unaided school on these grounds in the Maharashtra high courts.
Key Developments
- Rejection on “lack of facilities” Grounds – The school orally refused admission citing inadequate infrastructure, a claim that contradicts the RPwD Act’s requirement that the institution must make necessary changes or procure support.
- Demand for Shadow Teachers – The school demanded that the mother hire and finance a private shadow teacher. According to the RPwD Act, such support is to be provided by the school under the umbrella of inclusive education.
- Legal Petition Filed – The mother’s petition, lodged by advocate Rita Joshi, seeks direct intervention from the High Court to mandate admission, remove the financial burden on the family, and enforce provision of specialized staff and infrastructure.
- Court’s Response – The Bombay High Court has scheduled an urgent hearing for Monday, with Justices Ravindra Ghuge and Ashwin Bhobe to hear the case before the end of the month.
- Statistical Backdrop – According to the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (2024), around 20% of children in India have some form of disability, yet only about 6% attend schools that are truly inclusive.
Impact Analysis
For families with children who need special education, this case underscores a crucial reality: merely securing a seat under the disability quota does not guarantee access. Schools can still impose hidden barriers that effectively exclude the child. The ramifications reach beyond the twins.
For international students and their families navigating India’s education system, the case signals that:
- Government provisions for disability support must be actively enforced, especially in the private sector.
- Schools may attempt to offload costs onto parents, a practice that is illegal under current statutes but still common.
- Lack of inclusive education can delay or derail a child’s transition into the workforce, affecting long‑term career prospects.
- Parents’ advocacy can prompt institutional change, but often requires persistence and legal backing.
The denial of a right to education for children with autism or ADHD is a blow to workforce trends that rely on inclusive talent pipelines. Employers increasingly seek graduates who have benefited from inclusive schooling, valuing the resilience and diversity that such backgrounds foster. When schools fail to provide equitable access, they limit the talent pool in critical sectors such as technology, healthcare, and finance.
Expert Insights / Tips
Dr. Kavita Nayar, a specialist in inclusive education and senior policy advisor at the National Institute of Open Schooling, stresses the importance of “early intervention.” “The first few years are critical for children with autism. Delays in education not only hinder academic growth but also social integration and future employability.”
Practical steps for international families:
- Document Everything – Keep records of all communications, admissions forms, and any correspondence that shows the school’s stance.
- Know the Law – Familiarize yourself with the RTE Act, Section 16 of RPwD Act, and relevant Supreme Court judgments. Many NGOs publish summary guides.
- Leverage School Grievance Mechanisms – File a formal complaint with the school’s grievance officer, citing statutory provisions.
- Escalate to State Education Department – If the school is unresponsive, bring the case to the State Education Department and request intervention under the RTE guidelines.
- Seek Legal Counsel – A lawyer experienced in education law can help file petitions, prepare affidavits, and represent your interests before the court.
- Explore Alternative Schools – While awaiting resolution, consider enrolling the child in a school that is certified for inclusive education (check for IAPSI or CBSE certifications).
- Access Support Services – Utilize services like My School India or Special Education Helpline that offer assistance in locating inclusive institutions.
For international students, the case serves as a reminder that disability inclusion isn’t just a domestic issue. Many countries have robust inclusion laws, and the trend is worldwide. By staying informed and proactive, students with disabilities can navigate local education systems and secure the support they need.
Looking Ahead
As the Bombay High Court prepares to hear the petition, the judiciary may set a precedent that will reverberate across the country, potentially reshaping how private schools interpret the RTE and RPwD Acts. A ruling in favor of the twins could compel institutions nationwide to provide the necessary resources for students with special needs, removing the financial onus from families.
On the policy front, both the state and central government are under pressure to tighten monitoring mechanisms. Possible actions include:
- Issuing guidelines that explicitly prohibit schools from requesting parents to fund supportive staff.
- Establishing an independent body to audit compliance of accredited schools regarding inclusive education.
- Mandating transparent reporting on the number of seats allocated and actually filled for students with disabilities.
- Introducing incentives for schools that achieve measurable inclusivity benchmarks.
Meanwhile, student employers and educational advisors should prioritize inclusivity in their recruitment and placement strategies. By fostering an environment where children with disabilities receive equitable education, the workforce gains diverse skills and a broader range of talents.
Stay tuned for updates on how this case shapes India’s approach to disability inclusion in education and the ripple effects on the labor market.
Reach out to us for personalized consultation based on your specific requirements.
