Bombay high court is set to hear a landmark case where a mother of autistic twins challenges a private school’s refusal to admit her children under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act. The court hearing could reshape how schools accommodate children with special needs across India and fortify the judiciary’s stance on inclusive education.
Background and Context
The case centres on Rita Joshi, a mother and advocate, who filed a petition after the Andheri West school denied enrollment to her seven‑year‑old twins diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although the twins were allotted seats in 2024 under the RTE disability quota, the school cited a lack of facilities and insisted that shadow teachers be hired and financed by the parents. Joshi argues that this requirement breaches Section 16 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act and defeats the very purpose of inclusive education guaranteed by the Constitution.
India’s RTE Act, implemented in 2009, mandates free and compulsory education for every child up to the age of 14, while the RPwD Act obliges schools to provide reasonable accommodation at no extra cost. In October 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that a child with a disability cannot be denied admission on the ground of “lack of facilities.”
For international students and their families, this case signals a growing scrutiny of private institutions’ compliance with national education laws and underscores the importance of understanding the legal pathways to enforce inclusive rights.
Key Developments in the Court Filing
The petition filed on December 1, 2025, details the twins’ journey:
- Diagnosed at 2.5 years old; parents sought RTE admission in July 2024.
- School allotted seats but denied enrollment in August–September 2024, demanding privately hired shadow teachers.
- Joshi appealed to the Maharashtra Education Department, but no action was taken.
- She now seeks a court order that: a) directs the Centre, state, and the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to re‑allot the children to the same school; b) mandates the school to admit the twins immediately; c) requires the institution to provide shadow teachers and necessary infrastructure at no cost for the duration of their primary education.
The mother also highlighted her personal hardship, noting a Stage III breast cancer diagnosis in November 2024, which delayed filing the petition. “This medical condition has physically limited my capacity to travel and file proceedings earlier,” she wrote.
Justice Ravindra Ghuge and Justice Ashwin Bhobe have scheduled an urgent hearing for December 10, 2025, after advocate Ashok Shetty filed a supplementary application on December 8.
Impact Analysis: What It Means for Students and Parents
For families of children with special needs, this case reinforces the principle that schools cannot outsource accommodation responsibilities to parents. The ruling could set a binding precedent that affects:
- Private schools nationwide must reassess their policies and upgrade facilities to comply with RTE and RPwD obligations.
- Students who rely on RTE allocations will have clearer legal recourse if denied admission.
- Parents of international students studying in India may use this precedent to challenge discriminatory practices in overseas institutions that partner with Indian schools.
- The decision may prompt the Ministry of Education to issue stricter guidelines and regular audits of private schools’ inclusive education infrastructure.
Moreover, a favorable verdict could accelerate the integration of technology—such as assistive devices and remote teaching platforms—into mainstream classrooms, addressing the “lack of facilities” argument that schools often use to bar disabled students.
Expert Insights and Practical Guidance
Legal scholars and education consultants agree that while the case itself is not about immigration or visa policy, it offers actionable insights for international students seeking to study in India:
- Research school accreditation: Verify whether the institution complies with RTE & RPwD guidelines. Ask for documented inclusive education plans and infrastructure reports.
- Engage parent‑teacher associations: These bodies can amplify student voices and pressure schools to meet legal standards.
- Maintain documentation: Keep all medical reports, school correspondence, and RTE allotment papers, as they are key evidence if a dispute arises.
- Know your rights: The Ministry of Education publishes a “Guide to Inclusive Education,” which outlines parents’ and students’ rights under Section 16 of the RPwD Act.
- When facing refusal, file a written complaint with the state education department within 30 days. If the department does not act, consider a public interest litigation (PIL) or a petition in the High Court.
These steps are not only useful for families of disabled children but also for any student experiencing inequitable treatment based on disability, gender, or other protected characteristics.
Looking Ahead: The Road to Full Inclusion
Should the Bombay high court rule in favour of Mrs. Joshi, the decision will likely precipitate a statewide audit of private schools’ compliance with RTE and RPwD mandates. An expected outcome is the development of a standardized inclusivity checklist, similar to the “School Infrastructure Assessment” (SIA) currently used by the Government of Maharashtra.
Government officials anticipate issuing new guidelines by early 2026 that will:
- Mandate all schools, both aided and unaided, to provide individualized education plans (IEPs) for students with disabilities.
- Require budgeting for assistive technology—like speech‑to‑text software and sensory‑friendly classroom designs—as part of the school’s annual financial plan.
- Introduce a transparent grievance‑redressal portal for parents to lodge complaints and track resolutions.
For international students, universities and colleges will increasingly need to coordinate with Indian schools to ensure that admission requirements do not inadvertently exclude students with developmental disorders. This could reshape admission policies and drive collaboration between global educational institutions and Indian ministries.
In the broader context of technology trends, the case highlights how AI‑enabled platforms and virtual learning environments can bridge accessibility gaps. Online tutoring tools already offer customized pacing for students with ASD and ADHD; courts and educational policymakers may encourage their wider adoption as a complement to physical infrastructure.
While the immediate focus remains on the court’s hearing, stakeholders should monitor the outcome closely. A ruling in this case will not only clarify the responsibilities of private schools but also reaffirm the judiciary’s role in safeguarding inclusive education under foundational constitutional rights.
Reach out to us for personalized consultation based on your specific requirements.
