Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey has publicly condemned the “deep mistrust” surrounding the investigation into the fatal shooting of a woman by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer, calling for transparency and accountability amid growing public concern. The incident, which occurred on a Minneapolis street in late 2025, has sparked a national debate over ICE’s operational conduct and the federal government’s handling of the case, especially as President Trump’s administration pushes for stricter immigration enforcement.
Background and Context
The shooting took place on December 28, 2025, when ICE officer Jonathan Ross fired his weapon at 23‑year‑old Renee Nicole Good, who was allegedly attempting to flee a raid on a local high school. Good was killed on the scene, and the incident was captured on a bystander’s smartphone, quickly circulating on social media. The video shows Ross firing multiple shots before Good collapsed, raising immediate questions about the necessity and proportionality of force used.
In the weeks that followed, the Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) launched separate investigations. However, conflicting statements from officials, delays in releasing body‑cam footage, and the federal government’s insistence on keeping the investigation “underway” have fueled accusations of a cover‑up. Mayor Frey’s remarks come at a time when the Trump administration has intensified its rhetoric on immigration, promising to “make ICE a force for good” while simultaneously tightening enforcement protocols.
For international students and residents in the Twin Cities, the incident underscores the precariousness of living in a city where federal immigration enforcement can intersect with local policing. The mayor’s call for transparency is a plea for the community to regain trust in both local and federal institutions.
Key Developments
Mayor Frey’s Statement
- On January 10, 2026, Frey appeared on NBC’s “Meet the Press” to address the investigation, stating, “The evidence we have so far does not support the narrative that the officer was acting in self‑defense. The community deserves a thorough, unbiased inquiry.”
- He urged the DHS to release all video evidence, including the officer’s body‑cam footage, and called for an independent review by a civilian oversight board.
- Frey also criticized the Trump administration’s “tight‑rope” approach to immigration enforcement, arguing that it creates a climate of fear among immigrant communities.
DHS and MPD Actions
- The DHS announced on January 5 that it would “provide a full, transparent review” of the incident, but the review’s scope and timeline remain unclear.
- MPD released a statement on January 7 confirming that it had obtained the officer’s body‑cam footage and would submit it to the Minneapolis Office of Police Accountability.
- On January 9, a federal judge in Minneapolis ordered the DHS to disclose all documents related to the case, citing the public’s right to know.
- Local advocacy groups, including the Minneapolis Immigrant Rights Coalition, organized a protest on January 11, demanding the immediate release of all evidence and an independent investigation.
- The protest drew over 2,000 participants, many of whom carried signs reading “Justice for Renee” and “Transparency Now.”
- Mayor Frey’s office responded by announcing a town hall meeting scheduled for January 15 to discuss the investigation’s progress and community concerns.
Impact Analysis
The unfolding investigation has several implications for residents, especially international students who may be navigating the complexities of U.S. immigration law and campus safety.
- Legal Uncertainty – The incident highlights the potential for ICE officers to act in ways that may not align with local law enforcement protocols. Students on visas may find themselves at risk if they are mistakenly identified as targets during raids.
- Campus Security – Universities in Minneapolis, such as the University of Minnesota and Minneapolis College of Art and Design, have increased security measures, including additional patrols and coordination with local police. However, the presence of federal agents on campus has raised concerns about privacy and civil liberties.
- Community Trust – The mistrust surrounding the investigation erodes confidence in both local and federal agencies. This can lead to reduced cooperation with law enforcement, hindering crime prevention efforts.
- Policy Implications – The Trump administration’s push for stricter immigration enforcement may result in more frequent ICE raids, especially in cities with large immigrant populations. This could affect the overall climate for international students and their families.
Expert Insights and Practical Guidance
Legal scholars and immigration advocates have weighed in on the situation, offering advice for students and residents.
Dr. Maya Patel, Immigration Law Professor at the University of Minnesota
- “Students should be aware that ICE can operate independently of local police. If you are approached by federal agents, it is crucial to remain calm, identify yourself, and request to see a warrant or legal documentation.”
- “Keep copies of all documents related to your visa status, and consider registering with the U.S. Department of State’s Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) to ensure your records are up to date.”
Maria Gomez, Director of the Minneapolis Immigrant Rights Coalition
- “We recommend that students join community groups that provide legal assistance and real‑time updates on ICE activities. Knowledge is power.”
- “If you feel threatened or believe you have been wrongfully targeted, contact a local attorney who specializes in immigration law immediately.”
Practical steps for students and residents include:
- Maintain a digital backup of all immigration documents.
- Register with local community organizations that monitor federal enforcement activities.
- Attend town hall meetings and public hearings to stay informed about ongoing investigations.
- Use reputable news sources and official government releases to verify information before sharing on social media.
Looking Ahead
The investigation into the ICE shooting is still in its early stages, but several developments are likely to shape its trajectory.
– If the Minneapolis Office of Police Accountability is granted access to all evidence, an independent review could either exonerate or implicate the officer, influencing future policy on federal‑local cooperation. – The Trump administration may face pressure to revise its enforcement protocols, especially if the investigation reveals procedural violations. This could lead to new guidelines on the use of force by ICE officers. – Mayor Frey’s town hall meetings and the city’s commitment to transparency may set a precedent for other municipalities dealing with federal enforcement actions. – A federal court ruling that mandates the release of all evidence could establish a legal standard for future cases involving federal agents on local soil.
For international students, the situation underscores the importance of staying informed and prepared. Universities are expected to enhance their support services, offering legal counseling and safety briefings tailored to the evolving immigration landscape.
As the investigation unfolds, the community’s demand for accountability and transparency remains a central theme. Whether the outcome will restore trust or deepen skepticism depends on the thoroughness of the inquiry and the willingness of federal agencies to cooperate openly.
Reach out to us for personalized consultation based on your specific requirements.
